Doubly effective one round election model: Improving efficiency and fiscal savings
Abstract
Electoral processes are usual in most countries around the world. The most dominant electoral system is the standard Two-Round System (TRS). Despite the variety of models for electing public representatives, all result in public expenditure. In democratic societies, we cannot avoid such an expense, but we can minimize it. Minimizing expenses in line with simplicity and justice of the electoral processes is the primary goal of this paper. We propose an entirely new one-round election model that can replace and successfully simulate the existing two-round model. Our proposed solution is unique, and we have named it the Doubly Effective One Round election model (DEOR election model). The literature contains many similar approaches, such as Ranked Choice Voting (RCV)/Instant-Runoff Voting (IRV), Single Transferable Vote (STV), Approval Voting, or Majority Judgment, but this proposed model is entirely new. As the new model is based on a ranking method, it offers additional advantages and possibilities, which are explained and illustrated through several examples in the paper. In addition to its efficiency, the application of this model can bring significant fiscal savings.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).