ROLE OF THE PARENTS IN THE EXERCISE OF THE CHILD’S RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION

Authors

  • Ivan Šimović University of Zagreb, Faculty of law, Trg Republike Hrvatske 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
  • Josipa Kokić PhD candidate at the Deák Ferenc Doctoral School of Law, Miskolc Junior researcher at the Central European Academy, Budapest 3515 Miskolc-Egyetemváros, Egyetem út 1., Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/38104

Abstract

The right of the child to freedom of thought, conscience and religion is one of the four participation rights of the child, protected under Article 14, paragraph 1 of the UNCRC. As such, it enables the child to be an active member of society. However, due to child’s vulnerability, immaturity and dependency on adults, the role of parents in exercising this (and other) right(s) is of a great importance. As the child’s legal representatives, parents are entitled to provide direction and guidance in the exercise of this child’s right (Article 14, paragraph 2 of the UNCRC). Nevertheless, according to Family law theory, such direction and guidance must be subject to certain limitations. Additionally, parents are entitled to decide about child’s religious upbringing, which can result in conflict between their right to determine child’s religion and child’s rights, such as right to education, right to life, survival and development, and rights to physical integrity, self-determination and health. Conflicts are also likely to arise in case of divorce of parents in regarding the determination of child’s religious upbringing. While discussing the right to determine child’s religion, the role and rights of adoptive parents shall not be overlooked. Finally, the limitations of the right of the child to manifest religion are also examined.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

ROLE OF THE PARENTS IN THE EXERCISE OF THE CHILD’S RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION. (2025). EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 9, 300-325. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/38104