MEDIA RESPONSIBILITY TO AUTHORISE INFORMATION

LIMITS AND CHALLENGES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.46.1.10

Keywords:

authorised information; interview; interviewed persons; publisher responsibility; editor-in-chief.

Abstract

This paper addresses the responsibility to authorise  information that has the potential to harm third  persons, as a specific category of media content. The introduction analyses the legal concepts of  authorisation, its legal applications, and the range of  practices within court practice. The central topic of  the paper is the responsibility of the publisher to  authorise information, the identification of the primarily responsible persons, and exceptions to  general rules. Particular emphasis is placed on Article 21(7) of the Media Act, focusing on the assumption of  responsibility by the publisher and editor-in-chief. The alignment of these provisions with the legal standards of the European Court of Human Rights is considered, and problematic areas of the legal text are indicated, particularly in the sections applying  criminal law terminology and in reference to the editor-in-chief. The conclusion is that there is a need to amend legislation to achieve greater consistency in  practice and alignment with the European legal standard. 

Additional Files

Published

2025-04-15

How to Cite

MEDIA RESPONSIBILITY TO AUTHORISE INFORMATION: LIMITS AND CHALLENGES. (2025). Collected Papers of the Law Faculty of the University of Rijeka, 46(1), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.46.1.10