THE RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR THE HOME IN THE CONTEXT OF ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTIONS IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/36162Keywords:
the right to respect for the home, autonomous concept, principle of proportionality, illegal constructionAbstract
In the article, the author analyses the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (Constitutional Court) in relation to the right to respect for the home under Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 38 of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, focusing on specific issues that have arisen in the recent practice in connection with the demolition of illegally constructed buildings. In determining the existence of "home" and admissibility of restrictions on the right to the home, the ECtHR applies its own interpretative techniques, methods and principles, which it has mainly developed in its case-law. The Croatian Constitutional Court has also accepted this approach of the ECtHR with regard to this right. The ECtHR starts from the autonomous concept of the right to the home. In other words, the existence of a home does not depend on the classification under the domestic law of the contracting states. It is a factual and not a legal concept and depends on the existence of "sufficient and continuous links" with a specific place. In addition to the autonomous approach, the violation of the right to the home requires the application of the principle of proportionality, which also applies to cases brought by individuals living in premises intended for demolition, especially bearing in mind the public interest that exists on the other side. In the article, the author analyses cases in which state’s interferences with the right to respect for the home of persons living in the buildings scheduled for demolition have been examined by the application of the principle of proportionality. The article includes also points of criticism that the ECtHR has suffered due to the (sometimes inconsistent) application of its interpretative techniques and methods.
References
Bagić S, Načelo razmjernosti u praksi europskih sudova i hrvatskog Ustavnog suda (Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu 2016)
Bodul D, "The right to a home in the case-law of ECHR vs. the right to a home in the case-law of Croatian courts" (2018) 2 EU and comparative law issues and challenges series 553
Bossuyt M, "Should the Strasbourg Court exercise more self-restraint? On the extension of the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights to social security regulations", (2007) 28 Human rights law journal 321
Brems E, Gerards J, Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2014)
Bruskina N, "Unlawful construction: the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights" (2019) Teisės viršenybės link. Vilniaus universiteto Teisės fakultetas 71
Donders Y, "Protecting the home and adequate housing: living in a caravan or trailer as a human right" (2016) 5 (1) International Human Rights Law Review 1
Đerđa D. „Načelo razmjernosti u donošenju upravnih odluka“ (2016) 37 (1) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 175
Gerards J, "The prism of fundamental rights" (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 173
Krtalić V, „Bespravna gradnja – uzroci i posljedice“ (2006) 58 (10) Građevinar 813
Letsas G, "Proportionality as Fittingness: The Moral Dimension of Proportionality" (2018) 71 Current Legal Problems 1
Letsas G, "Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation" (2006) 26 (4) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705
Letsas G, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, (OUP Oxford 2007)
Marochini Zrinski M, „Izazovi u primjeni i tumačenju Konvencije u Republici Hrvatskoj“ (2018) 55 (2) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 423
Marochini Zrinski M, „Mogućnost uvođenja obveznog cijepljenja protiv Covid-19 bolesti primjenom načela razmjernosti uz prikaz postojeće prakse Europskog suda za ljudska prava i Ustavnog suda Republike Hrvatske“ 95 (2022) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 13
Marochini Zrinski M, „O tumačenju Europske konvencije o ljudskim pravima“ (2014) 51 (1) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 63
Marochini Zrinski M, „Utjecaj konvencijskih načela tumačenja na pojedine građanskopravne institute (odabrana pitanja)“ (2018) 57 (78) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 127
Marochini Zrinski M, Socio-economic dimension of the European Convention on Human Rights (Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci 2013)
Mihelčić G, Marochini Zrinski M i Šantek, R, „Od predmeta McCann do predmeta F. J. M. – razmjernost i pravo na poštovanje doma kod prisilnog namirenja stvarnopravno osiguranih tražbina iz nekretnine“ (2020) 41 (1) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 113
Mihelčić G, Marochini Zrinski M, „Koneksitet ostvarenja vindikacijskog zahtjeva na nekretnini i tzv. prava na poštovanje doma“ (2014) 35 (1) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 163
Mowbray A, "The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights" (2005) Human Rights Law Review 57
Nic Shuibhne, E. N. L. Bruijn, M, Vols, M. "Deconstructing the Eviction Protections Under the Revised European Social Charter: A Systematic Content Analysis of the Interplay Between the Right to Housing and the Right to Property" (2023) 23 (4) Human Rights Law Review 1
Omejec J, Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda u praksi Europskog suda za ljudska prava, Strasburški acquis (Novi informator 2013)
Rainey B, Wicks e, Ovey C, The European Convention on Human Rights (OUP,OXFORD, 2018)
Remiche A, "Yordanova and others v. Bulgaria: The Influence of the Social Right to Adequate Housing on the Interpretation of the Civil Right to Respect for One's Home" (2012) Human Rights Law Review 787
Spano R, "Universality or Diversity of Human Rghts? Strabourg in the Age of subsidiarity"(2014) Human Rights Law Review 407
Vila M I, "Subsidiarity, margin of appreciation and international adjudication within a cooperative conception of human rights" (2017) 15 (2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 393
PROPISI I DOKUMENTI
Konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda (Narodne novine – Međunarodni ugovori, broj 18/1997, 6/1999, 8/1999, 14/2002, 1/2006 i 13/2017) (HR)
Ustav Republike Hrvatske (Narodne novine, broj 56/1990, 135/1997, 113/2000, 28/2001, 76/2010 i 5/2014) (HR)
Zakon o gradnji (Narodne novine, broj 153/2013, 20/2017, 39/2019, 125/2019, 145/2024 ) (HR)
Zakon o državnom inspektoratu (Narodne novine, broj 115/2018, 117/2021, 67/2023, 155/2023) (HR)
Zakon o postupanju s nezakonito izgrađenim zgradama (Narodne novine, broj 86/2012, 143/2013, 65/2017, 14/2019) (HR)
Europska socijalna povelja (Narodne novine – Međunarodni ugovori, broj 15/2022) (HR)
SUDSKE ODLUKE
Alif Ahmadov and Others v. Azerbaijan, App no 22619/14 (ECtHR 4 May 2023)
Engel and others v The Netherlands App no 5100/71, 5101/71, 5102/71, 5354/71, (ECtHR 8 June 1976)
Odluka U-III-5795/2020 USRH (10. lipnja 2021) (HR)
Odluka U-III-215/2023 USRH (13. srpnja 2023) (HR)
Odluka U-III-2000/2021 USRH (14. rujna 2023) (HR)
Odluka U-III-986/2021 USRH (15. veljače 2024) (HR)
Odluka U-III-2117/2023 USRH (8. svibnja 2024) (HR)
Odluka U-III-2182/2023 USRH (15. travnja 2025) (HR)
Gillow v The United Kingdom App no 9063/80 (ECtHR 24 November 1986)
F.J.M. v The United Kingdom App no 76202/16 (ECtHR 6 November 2018)
Chapman v The United Kingdom App no 27238/95 (EStHR 18 January 2001)
Yordanova and others v Bulgaria App no 25446/06 (ECtHR 24 April 2012)
Connors v United Kingdom App no 66746/01, (ECtHR 27 May 2004)
Saliba v. Malta, App no 4251/02 (ECtHR 8 November 2005)
McCann v The United Kingdom App no 19009/04 (ECtHR 13 May 2008)
Zehentner v Austria App no 20082/02 (ECtHR 16 July 2009)
Paulić v Croatia App no 3572/06 (ECtHR 22 October 2009)
Orlić v Croatia App no 48833/07 (ECtHR 21 June 2011)
Bjedov v Croatia App no 42150/09 (ECtHR 29 May 2012)
Brežec v Croatia App no 7177/10 (ECtHR 18 July 2013)
Vrzić v Croatia App no 43777/13 (ECtHR 12 July 2016)
Mateljan v Croatia, App no 64855/11 (ECtHR 12 June 2018)
Kaminskas v Lithuania App no 44817/18 (ECtHR 4 August 2020)
Ghailan and others v Spain App no 36366/14 (ECtHR 23 June 2021)
Simonova v Bulgaria App no 30782/16 (ECtHR 11. April 2023)
Baykin i drugi protiv Rusije, App no 45720/17 (ECtHR 11 February 2020), §§ 64., 70. - 74.
Ivanova nad Cherkezov v Bulgaria App no 46577/15 (ECtHR 21 April 2016)
Buckley v The United Kingdom App no 20348/92 (ECtHR 25 September 1996)
MREŽNI IZVORI
Marc Bossuyt, "The Court of Strasbourg Acting as an Asylum Court", Published online by Cambridge University Press on 11 September 2012, <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/court-of-strasbourg-acting-as-an-asylum-court1/191EC85E6DA14349925E1DC77C13FF12> pristupljeno 14. travnja 2025.
Matuško Antonić Lj, „Ozakonjenje (legalizacija) nezakonito izgrađene zgrade“ (2011) IUS-INFO, <https://www.iusinfo.hr/strucni-clanci/CLN20V01D2011B439> pristupljeno 15. travnja 2025.
The Focus: "The principle of proportionality and the concept of margin of appreciation in human rights law" (2013) Basic Law Bulletin Issue 15, <https://www.doj.gov.hk/en/publications/pdf/basiclaw/basic15_2.pdf> pristupljeno 15. travnja 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Miroslav Šeparović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in Pravni vjesnik of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in Pravni vjesnik.
