ANIMAL WELFARE AND CORRUPTION IN SERBIA – HOW THE STATE ENABLES SYSTEMATIC ANIMAL ABUSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/37404Abstract
This study investigates how systemic corruption within Serbia’s publicly funded animal-welfare apparatus perpetuates large-scale cruelty toward dogs and cats. Its primary aim is twofold: (1) to trace the legal and administrative gaps that allow municipal authorities to outsource statutory animal-control duties to profit-driven private contractors, and (2) to show how this outsourcing – coupled with weak enforcement and opaque public spending – transforms shelters into sites of abuse, illicit killing and financial misuse. To achieve these aims, the research employs a qualitative, document-based methodology. It triangulates the analysis of legal provisions, publicly available documents, responses to FOI requests, reports from the State Audit Institution and the Ombudsman, and investigative journalism. Selected case studies of both public and private shelters are cross-referenced with media evidence to map recurring patterns of legal evasion, inflated contracting, and systemic animal abuse. Although field interviews were not conducted, the breadth of institutional sources enables a reconstruction of governance failures and corruption pathways. The objective is to demonstrate that the suffering of abandoned animals is not an accidental by-product of social neglect but a structurally reproduced outcome of legal inertia, administrative indifference and profit-seeking behaviour. By quantifying public expenditures – over €50 million for zoohygiene services and a further €43 million in dog-bite compensation during 2017–2020. – the paper exposes stark inefficiencies and perverse incentives that thwart humane, cost-effective solutions such as municipal catch-neuter-return programmes and regulated breeding. The findings seek to initiate policy reform, strengthen prosecutorial oversight and re-centre animal welfare within Serbia’s rule-of-law agenda.
References
Anderson E., ‘Animal Rights and the Values of Nonhuman Life’ in Sunstein C. and Nussbaum M. (eds.), Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (Oxford University Press, New York 2004)
Bajović V., ’Pravna reakcija na napuštanje životinja – problematika napuštenih životinja i životinja u prihvatilištima' in Bajović V. and Marković I. (eds.), Zbornik radova: Pravna zaštita životinja – U susret izmenama i dopunama Zakona o dobrobiti životinja (Univerzitet u Beogradu – Pravni fakultet 2024)
Bajović V., ’Pravni status životinja – pokretne stvari ili nešto više?’ in Ignjatović Đ. (ed.), Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji (Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu 2023)
Bakota B., ‘Public Administration and the Law of Animal Protection in Croatia’ (2023) 12(2) Perspectives of law and public administration 194
Bentham J., An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (T. Payne and son, London 1780)
Favre D., ‘Living Property: A New Status for Animals Within the Legal System’ (2010) 93(3) Marquette Law Review 1021
Hefetz A., Warner M., ‘Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process’ (2004) 14(2) Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 171
Jackman J., Rowan A., ‘Free-roaming dogs in developing countries: The benefits of capture, neuter, and return programs’ in Salem D. and Rowan A. (eds.), The State of the Animals IV (Humane Society Press 2007)
Nedić Т., ‘Pravni sustav zaštite života, zdravlja i dobrobiti životinja – bioetički pristup u pravnom okviru’ (2018) 27(1) Socijalna ekologija 71
Nedić T., Klasiček D., ‘Questioning Animals’ Status as Objects of Property Rights in Croatian and Comparative Property Law’ (2023) 39(2) Pravni vjesnik 53
Reece J., Chawla S., Hiby A., ‘Decline in human dog-bite cases during a street dog sterilisation programme in Jaipur, India’ (2013) 172(18) Veterinary Record 473
Regan T., Animal Rights, Human Wrongs: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy (Roman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Lanham 2003)
Sauder J., ‘Enacting and enforcing felony animal cruelty laws to prevent violence against humans’ (2000) 6 Animal Law Review, Lewis & Clark Law School 1
Singer P., Animal Liberation – The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement, 40th anniversary edition (Open road integrated media, New York 2015)
Stojanović N., ’Deset godina Zakona o dobrobiti životinja Republike Srbije’ (2019) 53(2) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 441
Stojanović N., ’Odgovornost za štetu koju životinja prouzrokuje prema Prednacrtu građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije’ (2018) 57(81) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 321
Živković N., ‘Delatnost zoohigijene – pitanje zakonitosti poveravanja poslova’ in Aktuelna pitanja savremenog zakonodavstva i pravosuđa – Zbornik radova sa savetovanja pravnika, Budva 7–9. jun 2025. godine (Savez udruženja pravnika 2025) 503
Živković N., Kaznena dela protiv životinja kao predmet krivičnog i prekršajnog postupka (PhD thesis, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu 2024)
REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS
Animal Welfare Act – AWA, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 41/2009 (RS)
Criminal Code, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 85/2005, 88/2005 – corr., 107/2005 – corr., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016, 35/2019, and 94/2024 (RS)
Law on Communal Services, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 88/2011, 104/2016, 95/2018, and 94/2024 (RS)
Law on Obligations, Official Gazette of the FFRY, Nos. 29/1978, 39/1985, 45/1989 – Decision of the Constitutional Court, and 57/1989; Official Gazette of the FRY, No. 31/1993; Official Gazette of SCG, No. 1/2003 – Constitutional Charter; and Official Gazette of the RS, No. 18/2020 (RS)
Regulation on the Method and Conditions for Commencing the Performance of Communal Activities, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 13/2018, 66/2018, and 51/2019 (RS)
Republički zavod za statistiku, Bilten – maloletni učinioci krivičnih dela u Republici Srbiji, 2023 (2024)
Republički zavod za statistiku, Bilten – punoletni učinioci krivičnih dela u Republici Srbiji, 2023 (2024)
Rulebook on the Conditions that Animal Breeding Facilities Must Meet, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 14/2012 and 49/2021
Rulebook on the Conditions that must be met by Animal Shelters and Boarding Facilities, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 19/2012 (RS)
Supreme Court of Cassation ruling No. Rev 1676/2015 dated 22 October 2015
Veterinary Act, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 91/2005, 30/2010, 93/2012, and 17/2019 – amended law (RS)
INTERNET SOURCES
Državna revizorska institucija – DRI, Izveštaj o reviziji svrsishodnosti poslovanja – efikasnost rešavanja problema napuštenih životinja (2021), <https://www.dri.rs/storage/upload/documents/revision/2022/2021-2-SV%20Efikasnost%20re%C5%A1avanja%20problema%20napu%C5%A1tenih%20%C5%BEivotinja.pdf> accessed 15 May 2025
HOROR U RUMI: Brutalno pobijen veliki broj pasa – tupim predmetom u glavu, ima i ubodnih rana!, <https://www.kurir.rs/vesti/drustvo/4416839/horor-u-rumi-brutalno-pobijen-veliki-broj-pasa-tupim-predmetom-u-glavu-ima-i-ubodnih-rana-uznemirujuce-slike> accessed 03 June 2025
Insajder, Slučaj masovne smrti pasa u Velikom Gradištu, <https://www.insajder.net/teme/slucaj-masovne-smrti-pasa-u-velikom-gradistu-tuzilastva-ne-odgovaraju-sta-je-sa-krivicnim-prijavama-protiv-vlasnice-prihvatilista-video> accessed 01 July 2025
NIN ISTRAŽUJE Jezivo mučenje pasa o trošku građana: Ministarstvo ne vidi zlostavljanje životinja (4), <https://www.nin.rs/drustvo/vesti/72918/jezivo-mucenje-pasa-o-trosku-gradana-4-deo-ministarstvo-ne-vidi-zlostavljanje-zivotinja> accessed 15 May 2025
NIN ISTRAŽUJE Monopol na zlostavljanje: Jezivo mučenje pasa o trošku građana (2), <https://www.nin.rs/drustvo/vesti/71596/jezivo-mucenje-pasa-o-trosku-gradana-monopol-na-zlostavljanje> accessed 15 May 2025
ORKA, Da li su životinje u Srbiji zaštićene – šta kaže statistika?, <https://orca.rs/da-li-su-zivotinje-u-srbiji-zasticene-sta-kaze-statistika/> accessed 20 March 2025
Statistics of the FCI members & partners: 2021, <https://www.fci.be/en/statistics/ByYear.aspx?year=2021> accessed 27 May 2025
Statistics of the FCI members & partners: 2022, <https://www.fci.be/en/statistics/ByYear.aspx?year=2022> accessed 27 May 2025
Zaštitnik građana Republike Srbije, Poseban izveštaj Zaštitnika građana – Problemi u primeni odredbi Zakona o veterinarstvu i Zakona o dobrobiti životinja o staranju o napuštenim i izgubljenim životinjama (2019), <https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/izvestaji/posebnii-izvestaji/6069-p-s-b-n-izv-sh-zg-pr-bl-i-u-pri-ni-dr-dbi-z-n-v-rin-rs-vu-i-z-n-d-br-bi-i-ziv-inj-s-r-nju-n-push-ni-i-izgublj-ni-ziv-inj> accessed 15 May 2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vanja Bajović, Natalija Živković

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in Pravni vjesnik of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in Pravni vjesnik.



