THE EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL INSTITUTE OF CONVALIDATION OF NULL AND VOID CONTRACTS IN THE YUGOSLAV LEGAL TRADITION
HISTORICAL INFLUENCES AND LEGAL LEGACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/38233Abstract
Contract law is fundamentally shaped by the tension between fairness and enforceability, a balance that defective contracts often disrupt. While formal requirements are introduced above else to safeguard public policy goals—such as ensuring legal certainty—subsequent validation of defective contracts (convalidation) serves to rectify them, primarily focusing on the private interests of the parties involved. This paper examines the role of convalidation in Yugoslav contract law, a common legal tradition shared by West-Balkan countries that formerly belonged to the SFRY, tracing its development in the context of legal pluralism and the political transformations of the era. It further explores the contemporary implementation of convalidation across the successor states: Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and North Macedonia. Through the lens of the 1978 federal Obligations Act, the paper investigates the historical evolution of contract law in these states, questioning whether local legal traditions, influenced by regional legal particularities, have shaped the application of convalidation in divergent or uniform ways. The study clarifies the concept of 'convalidation,' which, while not always explicitly mentioned in legal texts, has been a part of the legal framework, primarily applied to voidable contracts and, less commonly, to irremediable, null and void contracts. It facilitates their transformation into valid contracts, allowing them to produce legal effects previously unavailable to them, if specific conditions are met. By exploring the flexibility of convalidation and its aim to vindicate both on both private and public interests, the paper sheds light on how it contributes to fairness and legal certainty in the legal systems of post-Yugoslav states. The research is structured around three historical periods, reflecting key socio-political shifts in the region, to trace the evolution of convalidation in the common Yugoslav legal tradition.
References
Blagojević B T, ‘Zakon o obligacionim odnosima u svetlosti svog vremena’ (1978) 26 Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 227
Dime-Ilijevska P, ’Konvalidacija ugovora o kupoprodaji nepokretnosti’in Đekić Dragoslav (ed), Zakon o obligacionim odnosima 1978–1988 (Savez udruženja pravnika SR Srbije 1988) 320
Dolović Bojić K. G, Pravno nepostojeći ugovori (Univerzitet u Beogradu – Pravni fakultet Centar za izdavaštvo 2021)
Dudás A, ’A polgári jog kodifikációjának történeti áttekintése Szerbiában’ (2013) 1 Jogtörténeti Szemle 9
Dudás A, ‘General Rules of Invalidity of Contracts in Serbian Law’ (2022) Review of European and Comparative Law (No 2) 51–70, DOI: 10.31743/recl.13441
Dudás A and Szitás E, ‘Convalidation of Form-Defective Contracts on the Conveyance of Ownership of Real Property in Serbian, Croatian, and Slovenian Law’ in Tomislav Karlović and Elizabeta Ivičević Karas (eds), Legatum pro anima: Zbornik radova u čast Marku Petraku (Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu 2024) 993
Drakić G, ’Građansko pravo na vojvođanskom pravnom području u Kraljevini Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca’ (2013) Zbornik radova Međunarodnog naučnog skupa „Harmonizacija građanskog prava u regionu“ 107
Gorenc V and others, Komentar Zakona o obveznim odnosima (Narodne novine d.d. 2014)
Đurović R and Orlić M, ‘Od Opšteg imovinskog zakonika do Zakona o obligacionim odnosima’ (1978) 26 Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 245
Hamza G, 'Private Law: Development and Codification in Germany' (2004) 44 Annales U Sci Budapestinensis Rolando Eotvos Nominatae 61
Karamarković L, Rasprave iz ugovornog, odštetnog i procesnog prava (Glosarijum 2004)
Karčić F, A Study on Legal Formalism in the Former Yugoslavia and its Successor States (Centre for Integrity in the Defence Sector 2020)
Karlović T, ‘Neka razmatranja o nastanku stipulacijske obveze’ (2012) 62(3) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 901
Klarić P and Vedriš M, Građansko pravo (14th edn, Narodne novine 2014)
Lavický P and others, Private Law Reform (1st edn, Masaryk University Faculty of Law 2014)
Luković M. D, Bogišićev zakonik: priprema i jezičko oblikovanje (Balkanološki institut SANU 2009)
Mirković Z., 'Mihailo Konstantinović o radu na Građanskom zakoniku u međuratnoj Jugoslaviji' (2022) Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, Poseban broj u čast profesora Mihaila Konstantinovića <https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk03a> 79
Nikolić D, ’Dva veka građanskog prava u obnovljenoj Srbiji (1804–2004)’ (2005) 4 Glasnik advokatske komore Vojvodine Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu 151
Nikolić D, ’Dva veka Austrijskog građanskog zakonika (1811–2011)’ (2011) Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke 135/2011 <https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1135113n> 313
Pantić D, 'Privatnopravni partikularizam i pokušaji unifikacije građanskog prava u Jugoslaviji između dva rata' (1983–1984) 20 Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 115
Petrović A and Jukan E, ‘Obavezna forma ugovora nakon presude U 2/16’ (2019) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Tuzli (No 1) 41
Pohlmann P, Die Heilung formnichtiger Verpflichtungsgeschäfte durch Erfüllung [Performance-based Curing of Undertakings Rendered Void due to Formal Deficiencies] (Münsterische Beiträge zur Rechtswissenschaft, vol 61, Duncker & Humblot 1992)
Šarac M. ‘Ratihabitio mandato comparatur’ (2008) 29(2) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 761
Salma J, ’Srpski građanski zakonik (SGZ, 1844) i obligaciono pravo’ (2004) 2 Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 311
Smits J. M. Contract law: A Comparative Introduction, 3rd edn. (Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar 2021)
Shpresa Alimi-Memedi, ‘Formalism in Roman Contract Law’ (2019) 34(5) Knowledge – International Journal 1457
Sič M, ‘Posebna forma ugovora u antičkom Rimu – radi sigurnosti stranaka ili zaštite interesa države?’ (2000) in Popović M (ed), Rekonstrukcija pravnog sistema Jugoslavije na osnovama slobode, demokratije, tržišta i socijalne pravde II. (Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet) 59
Stanojević O, ’The ”Sketch” of Mihailo Konstantinović’ (1978) Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 26(3–5) 267
Staudigl-Ciechowicz K, ‘Die Teilnovellen als letzter Akt der österreichischen Zivilgesetzgebung in Mitteleuropa’ (2020) Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs http://dx.doi.org/10.1553/BRGOE2020‐2s286 286
Stocquart, E, “Marriage in Roman Law” The Yale Law Journal, vol. 16, no. 6, March 1907, pp. 303
Stojanović D, ’Društvena svojina u novom Ustavu i osnovni instituti izvedeni iz nje’ (1974) 14 Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 51
Tot I, ‘Poredbenopravni utjecaji na Zakon o obveznim odnosima’ in Tot I and Slakoper Z (eds), Hrvatsko obvezno pravo u poredbenopravnom kontekstu: petnaest godina Zakona o obveznim odnosima (Ekonomski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu 2022)
Veress E, ‘Private Law Codifications in East Central Europe’ in Pál Sáry (ed), Lectures on East Central European Legal History (Central European Academic Publishing 2022) 167
Windscheid B, Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts [Textbook of Pandect Law], vol 2, 8th edn, (Frankfurt a. M.: Rütten & Loening 1900)
Zimmermann R, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993
REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS
Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch from 1811 <https://viewer.onb.ac.at/1074A4A2/> accessed 30 August 2025
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch in the version promulgated on 2 January 2002 (Federal Law Gazette [Bundesgesetzblatt] I page 42, 2909; 2003 I page 738), last amended by Article 1 of the Act of 10 August 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 3515)
Obligacijski zakonik (Uradni list RS, št. 97/07 – uradno prečiščeno besedilo, 64/16 – odl. US in 20/18 – OROZ631)
Opšti imovinski zakonik za Knjaževinu Crnu Goru, na Cetinju u Državnoj štampariji 1888.
Zakon o obligacionim odnosima Službeni list SFRJ, br. 29/1978
Zakon o obligacionim odnosima ("Sl. list SFRJ", br. 29/1978, 39/1985, 45/1989 – odluka USJ i 57/1989, "Sl. list RBiH", br. 2/1992, 13/1993 i 13/1994 i "Sl. novine FBiH", br. 29/2003 i 42/2011)
Zakon o obligacionim odnosima ("Sl. list SFRJ", br. 29/1978, 39/1985, 45/1989 – odluka USJ i 57/1989 i "Sl. glasnik RS", br. 17/1993, 3/1996, 37/2001 – dr. zakon, 39/2003 i 74/2004)
Zakon o obligacionim odnosima ("Sl. list SFRJ", br. 29/1978, 39/1985, 45/1989 – odluka USJ i 57/1989, "Sl. list SRJ", br. 31/1993, "Sl. list SCG", br. 1/2003 – Ustavna povelja i "Sl. glasnik RS", br. 18/2020)
Zakon o obveznim odnosima (Narodne novine, broj 35/2005, 41/2008, 125/2011, 78/2015, 29/2018, 126/2021, 114/2022, 156/2022, 155/2023)
Zakon za obligacionite odnosi, Službeni vesnik na RM 18/2001, 78/2001, 4/2002, 59/2002, 5/2003, 84/2008, 81/2009, 161/2009, 23/2013, 123/2013 i 215/2021
Zakon o prometu nepokretnosti (Službeni glasnik RS, No. 93/2014, 121/2014 and 6/2015)
JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS
Supreme Court of the Republic of North Macedonia, Rev1.br.115/2015 (13th November 2014) Bulletin of the Case Law of the Supreme Court of the Republic of North Macedonia 2016–2017
Supreme Court of the Federation of BiH, Rev-531/04 (5th May 2005) Bulletin of the Case Law of the Supreme Court of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2005
Supreme Court of the Federation of BiH, 58 0 P 120081 20 Rev (13th April 2021) Bulletin of the Case Law of the Supreme Court of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2021
INTERNET SOURCES
Codex Iuris Canonici 1983 <https://www.vatican.va/archive/codiuriscanonici/eng/documents/cic_lib4cann9981165_en.html#TITLE_VII.> accessed 16 June 2025
County Court in Dubrovnik, Gž-388/15 (10th February 2016) <https://www.iusinfo.hr/sudska-praksa/ZSRH2015GzB388> accessed 30 August 2025
French Civil code in the version last amended 13 August 2025, available at <https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070721/> accessed 1 September 2025
High Commercial Court of the Republic of Croatia, Pž-23/2024-2 (11th December 2024) <https://www.iusinfo.hr/sudska-praksa/VTSRH2024PzB23A2> accessed 30 August 2025
Juridical position adopted at the session of the Civil Department of the Supreme Court of Cassation of Serbia held on November 2, 2018 <https://www.vrh.sud.rs/sites/default/files/attachments/Pravni%20stav%20%20konvalidacija%20ugovora%20o%20prometu%20nepokretnosti%20-%20Vesna%20Subic.pdf> accessed 30 August 2025
Kaiserliche Verordnung vom 19. März 1916, R. G. Bl. Nr. 69, über die dritte Teilnovelle zum Allgemeinen Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: mit Materialien. Wien, K. u. K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei 1916. III, 433 S <https://fedora.phaidra.univie.ac.at/fedora/objects/o:1160817/methods/bdef:Book/view#> accessed 10 February 2025
Supreme Court of Cassation of Serbia, Rev 29231/2023 (13th March 2025) <https://www.vrh.sud.rs/sr-lat/rev-292312023-31122> accessed 30 August 2025
Supreme Court of Slovenia, ECLI:SI:VSRS:1994:II.IPS.402.93 (Registration number: VS00942) (17th March 1994) <https://sodnapraksa.si/?q=id:2100&database[SOVS]=SOVS&database[IESP]=IESP&database[VDSS]=VDSS&database[UPRS]=UPRS&_submit=išči&page=0&id=2100> accessed 30 August 2025
Tot I, 'The Yugoslav Law on Obligations of 1978 and the Legacy of Professor Mihailo Konstantinović (1897–1982): The Influence of the Interwar Period on Post-WWII Legal Transfers' (Private Law Theory, 9 March 2024) <https://www.private-law-theory.org/2024/03/09/the-yugoslav-law-on-obligations-of-1978-and-the-legacy-of-professor-mihailo-konstantinovic-1897-1982-the-influence-of-the-interwar-period-on-post-wwii-legal-transfers/> accessed 11 January 2025
Zakonik građanskij za Knjažestvo Srbije 1844 <https://www.harmonius.org/sr/pravni-izvori/jugoistocna-evropa/privatno-pravo/srbija/Srpski_gradjanski_zakonik_1844.pdf> accessed 21 January 2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Attila Dudás, Emma Király-Szitás
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in Pravni vjesnik of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in Pravni vjesnik.
