GNSS Positioning Accuracy in Forest Environments: A Structured Critical Review of Canopy Effects and Mitigation Strategies

Authors

  • Bogdan Popovici Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava Faculty of Forestry Universității Street no. 13, 720229 Suceava, Romania https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0232-2794
  • Raffaele Pelorosso Tuscia University Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE) 01100 Viterbo (VT), Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-5921
  • Mihai Valentin Herbei University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timișoara Faculty of Agriculture Calea Aradului no. 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3658
  • Florin Sala University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timișoara Faculty of Agriculture Calea Aradului no. 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania
  • Mihai Avădanei University of Petroșani Faculty of Mines Universității Street no. 20, 332006 Petroșani, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67252/gl.2026.80.3.1

Keywords:

GNSS, forest canopy, positioning accuracy, RTK, LiDAR

Abstract

GNSS positioning under forest canopy remains challenging, as vegetation attenuates signals, promotes multipath propagation, and degrades satellite geometry. This paper presents a structured critical narrative review of the scientific literature published between 1996 and 2025, updated through a search to 2026. Autonomous GNSS, DGPS, RTK-GNSS, multi-GNSS and low-cost RTK, as well as GNSS–IMU, LiDAR, UAV, UWB, and SLAM approaches are compared. Evidence indicates a progressive deterioration in performance with canopy density. In the reviewed studies, autonomous GNSS errors frequently reach 15–30 m under dense canopy, while multi-GNSS RTK solutions report, under comparable conditions, approximately 0.5–2.03 m; ranges are indicative, not statistically aggregated estimates. GNSS integration with inertial sensors and LiDAR increases continuity and robustness, but operational validation remains limited. The main contribution is a decision-oriented framework that correlates canopy, degradation mechanisms, technology and mitigation strategies. Three priorities are highlighted: standardized reporting, forest-adapted corrections and comparative validation of multi-sensor systems.

References

Abdi, O., Uusitalo, J., Pietarinen, J., Lajunen, A. (2022): Evaluation of forest features determining GNSS positioning accuracy of a novel low-cost, mobile RTK system using LiDAR and TreeNet, Remote Sensing, 14, 12, art. 2856. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122856

Andersen, H.E., Reutebuch, S.E., McGaughey, R.J. (2006): A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 32, 5, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.5589/m06-032

Beland, M., Parker, G., Sparrow, B., Harding, D., Chasmer, L., Phinn, S., Thau, D., Strahler, A. (2019): On promoting the use of lidar systems in forest ecosystem research, Forest Ecology and Management, 450, art. 117484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117484

Beniušienė, L., Jonikavičius, D., Papartė, M., Aleinikovas, M., Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, I., Beniušis, R., Mozgeris, G. (2026): Tree Geo-Positioning in Coniferous Forest Plots: A Comparison of Ground Survey and Laser Scanning Methods, Forests, 17, 2, art. 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020272

Bettinger, P., Merry, K.L. (2012): Influence of the juxtaposition of trees on consumer-grade GPS position quality, Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences, 4, 2, 81–91.

Bolstad, P., Jenks, A., Berkin, J., Horne, K., Reading, W.H. (2005): A comparison of autonomous, WAAS, real-time, and post-processed global positioning systems (GPS) accuracies in northern forests, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 22, 1, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/22.1.5

Breidenbach, J., Næsset, E., Lien, V., Gobakken, T., Solberg, S. (2010): Prediction of species specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 4, 911–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.006

Cățeanu, M., Moroianu, M.A. (2024): Performance evaluation of real-time kinematic GNSS with survey-grade receivers in forested areas, Sensors, 24, 19, art. 6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196404

Dandois, J.P., Ellis, E.C. (2013): High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision, Remote Sensing of Environment, 136, 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.005

Deckert, C., Bolstad, P.V. (1996): Forest canopy, terrain, and distance effects on GPS point accuracy, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 3, 317–321.

Dubayah, R.O., Drake, J.B. (2000): Lidar remote sensing for forestry, Journal of Forestry, 98, 6, 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/98.6.44

El-Sheimy, N., Hou, H., Niu, X. (2008): Analysis and modeling of inertial sensors using Allan variance, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 57, 1, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2007.908635

Faitli, T., Hakala, T., Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Kukko, A. (2023): Real-time lidar-inertial positioning and mapping for forestry automation, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-145-2023

Feng, T., Chen, S., Feng, Z., Shen, C., Tian, Y. (2021): Effects of canopy and multi-epoch observations on single-point positioning errors of a GNSS in coniferous and broadleaved forests, Remote Sensing, 13, 12, art. 2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122325

Groves, P.D. (2013): Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, Artech House, Boston.

Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., Wasle, E. (2008): GNSS — Global Navigation Satellite Systems, Springer Vienna, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-73017-1

Hollaus, M., Wagner, W., Eberhöfer, C., Karel, W. (2006): Accuracy of large-scale canopy heights derived from LiDAR data under operational constraints in a complex alpine environment, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60, 5, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.03.004

Holopainen, M., Haapanen, R., Karjalainen, M., Vastaranta, M., Hyyppä, J., Yu, X., Tuominen, S., Hyyppä, H. (2010): Comparing accuracy of airborne laser scanning and TerraSAR-X radar images in the estimation of plot-level forest variables, Remote Sensing, 2, 2, 432–445. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2020432

Ji, M., Ren, G., Liu, J., Xu, Q., Ren, R. (2025): Multi-person cooperative positioning of forest rescuers based on inertial navigation system (INS), global navigation satellite system (GNSS), and ZigBee, Measurement, 241, art. 115669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115669

Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Vastaranta, M., Kukko, A., Jaakkola, A., Holopainen, M., Uuttera, J. (2015): Accuracy of kinematic positioning using global satellite navigation systems under forest canopies, Forests, 6, 9, 3218–3236. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6093218

Kaplan, E.D., Hegarty, C.J. (2017): Understanding GPS/GNSS: Principles and Applications, Artech House, Boston.

Konakoglu, B., Yilmaz, V. (2024): Evaluating the performance of the static PPP-AR in a forest environment, Journal of Surveying Engineering, 150, 2, art. 05023006. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1435

Liang, X., Kankare, V., Hyyppä, J., Wang, Y., Kukko, A., Haggrén, H., Yu, X., Kaartinen, H., Jaakkola, A., Guan, F., Holopainen, M., Vastaranta, M. (2016): Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 115, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.006

Lisein, J., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M., Bonnet, S., Lejeune, P. (2013): A photogrammetric workflow for the creation of a forest canopy height model from small unmanned aerial system imagery, Forests, 4, 4, 922–944. https://doi.org/10.3390/f4040922

Liu, Z., Kaartinen, H., Hakala, T., Hyyppä, J., Kukko, A., Chen, R. (2025): Tracking foresters and mapping tree stem locations with decimeter-level accuracy under forest canopies using UWB, Expert Systems with Applications, 262, art. 125519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125519

Magiera, W., Vārna, I., Mitrofanovs, I., Silabrieds, G., Krawczyk, A., Skorupa, B., Maciuk, K. (2022): Accuracy of code GNSS receivers under various conditions, Remote Sensing, 14, 11, art. 2615. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112615

Muhojoki, J., Hakala, T., Kukko, A., Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J. (2024): Comparing positioning accuracy of mobile laser scanning systems under a forest canopy, Science of Remote Sensing, 9, art. 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100121

Noureldin, A., Karamat, T., Georgy, J. (2013): Fundamentals of Inertial Navigation, Satellite-based Positioning and their Integration, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30466-8

Næsset, E. (2004): Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 2, 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580310019580

Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Holmgren, J., Hyyppä, H., Hyyppä, J., Maltamo, M., Nilsson, M., Olsson, H., Persson Å., Söderman, U. (2004): Laser scanning of forest resources: the Nordic experience, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 6, 482–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580410019553

Næsset, E., Jonmeister, T. (2002): Assessing point accuracy of DGPS under forest canopy before data acquisition, in the field and after postprocessing, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 4, 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580260138099

Ogundipe, O., Ince, S., Bonenberg, L. (2014): GNSS positioning under forest canopy, In: Proceedings of the ENC-GNSS 2014, European Navigation Conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 15–17 April 2014.

Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Moher, D. (2021): The PRISMA 2020 statement, BMJ, 372, art. n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pirti, A. (2008): Accuracy analysis of GPS positioning near the forest environment, Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 29, 2, 189–199.

Pirti, A., Gümüş, K., Erkaya, H., Hoşbaş, R. G. (2010): Evaluating repeatability of RTK GPS/GLONASS near/under forest environment, Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 31, 1, 23–33.

Pirti, A., Yucel, A. (2022): Evaluating Repeatability of RTK (GPS and Galileo/GPS) performance in the analysis of points located in areas with and without obstructions, Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 113, 1, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/rgg-2022-0001

Proudman, A., Ramezani, M., Digumarti, S.T., Chebrolu, N., Fallon, M. (2022): Towards real-time forest inventory using handheld LiDAR, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 157, art. 104240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104240

Puliti, S., Dash, J.P., Watt, M.S., Breidenbach, J., Pearse, G.D. (2020): A comparison of UAV laser scanning, photogrammetry and airborne laser scanning for precision inventory of small-forest properties, Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 93, 1, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz057

Reutebuch, S.E., McGaughey, R.J., Andersen, H.E., Carson, W.W. (2003): Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 5, 527–535. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-022

Rybansky, M., Kratochvil, V., Dohnal, F., Vystavel, O. (2026): Effect of forest vegetation density on the accuracy of GNSS navigation, Measurement, 267, art. 120542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.120542

Sigrist, P., Coppin, P., Hermy, M. (1999): Impact of forest canopy on quality and accuracy of GPS measurements, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 18, 3595–3610. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699211228

Strunk, J.L., Reutebuch, S.E., McGaughey, R.J., Andersen, H.E. (2025): An examination of GNSS positioning under dense conifer forest canopy in the Pacific Northwest, USA, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 37, art. 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101428

Tomaštík, J. Jr, Tomaštík, J. Sr, Saloň Š., Piroh, R. (2017): Horizontal accuracy and applicability of smartphone GNSS positioning in forests, Forestry, 90, 2, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpw031

Tomaštík, J., Everett, T. (2023): Static positioning under tree canopy using low-cost GNSS receivers and adapted RTKLIB software, Sensors, 23, 6, art. 3136. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063136

Vastaranta, M., Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Pekkarinen, A., Tuominen, S., Ginzler, C., Kankare, V., Holopainen, M., Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H. (2013): Airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery measures of forest structure: comparative results and implications to forest mapping and inventory update, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 39, 5, 382–395. https://doi.org/10.5589/m13-046

Wallace, L., Lucieer, A., Watson, C., Turner, D. (2012): Development of a UAV-LiDAR system with application to forest inventory, Remote Sensing, 4, 6, 1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4061519

White, J.C., Coops, N.C., Wulder, M.A., Vastaranta, M., Hilker, T., Tompalski, P. (2016): Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: A review, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42, 5, 619–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484

Wing, M.G., Eklund, A., Kellogg, L.D. (2005): Consumer-grade global positioning system (GPS) accuracy and reliability, Journal of Forestry, 103, 4, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/103.4.169

Wing, M.G., Eklund, A., Kellogg, L.D. (2007): Performance comparison of a low-cost mapping grade GPS receiver and consumer grade GPS receiver under dense forest canopy, Journal of Forestry, 105, 1, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/105.1.9

Wing, M.G., Kellogg, L.D. (2004): Digital data collection and analysis techniques for forestry applications, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Geoinformatics. University of Gävle, Gävle, 77–83.

Wulder, M.A., Bater, C.W., Coops, N.C., Hilker, T., White, J.C. (2008): The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management, The Forestry Chronicle, 84, 6, 807–826. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc84807-6

Downloads

Published

30.09.2026

Data Availability Statement

No new primary datasets were generated for this study. All information used in this review is available in the cited publications. Details regarding the literature selection and analysis are provided in the supplementary appendix submitted with the manuscript.

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

“GNSS Positioning Accuracy in Forest Environments: A Structured Critical Review of Canopy Effects and Mitigation Strategies” (2026) Geodetski list, 80(3), pp. 207–226. doi:10.67252/gl.2026.80.3.1.