THE LEGITIMATION OF A RE-ENACTMENT OF FORMER LAW AND TEMPORAL EFFECTS OF JUDGMENTS IN A CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY

Authors

  • Tímea Drinóczi Faculty of Law, University of Pécs, 48-as tér 1, 7622 Pécs, Hungary
  • Philipp Schneider Faculty of Law, University of Pécs, 48-as tér 1, 7622 Pécs, Hungary

Keywords:

Judicial review proceedings, Constitutional Court, re-enactment of former law, suspension of the Family Act (2014), Family Act (2003)

Abstract

In 2015, the Croatian Constitutional Court suspended the Family Act (2014) without a final decision in the judicial review proceedings and ordered the reenactment of a more than ten-year old regulation Family Act (2003). The article considers Croatian Constitutional Court’s decision as an opportunity to examine the conditions for a re-enactment of formerly repealed law, and additionally the temporal effects of judgments of some European constitutional courts from a comparative law perspective. Thus, the article first deals with the (historical) legal situation in Austria and Germany and the criteria that would generally justify the re-enactment of former law in their legal systems. Finally, the development of these countries’ legal systems has been reconsidered in the Croatian context.

Author Biographies

  • Tímea Drinóczi, Faculty of Law, University of Pécs, 48-as tér 1, 7622 Pécs, Hungary
    PhD, dr. habil., associate professor
  • Philipp Schneider, Faculty of Law, University of Pécs, 48-as tér 1, 7622 Pécs, Hungary
    Ass. Iur., M.A., DAAD guest lecturer

Downloads

Published

2017-04-04

Issue

Section

Orginal scientific article