Corporate Social Responsibility and Transition toParenthood: Responsible Purchasing and Implicationsfor Retail Performance

Authors

  • Ivana Štulec University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business, Zagreb, Croatia
  • Kristina Petljak University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business, Zagreb, Croatia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-1928
  • Eva Lienbacher University of Salzburg, Faculty of Law, Business & Economics, Salzburg, Austria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22598/pi-be/2026.1.41449

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, transition to parenthood, responsible purchasing, retail performance, baby products, qualitative research

Abstract

Purpose: Despite growing research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in retail and an increasing body of work on consumer behaviour during major life transitions, limited attention has been devoted to understanding how the transition to parenthood shapes parents’ perceptions of CSR and responsible purchasing decisions in the baby and children’s products segment. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to determine how the transition to parenthood influences parents’ perceptions of the CSR of manufacturers and retailers of baby and children’s products, and to analyse the existence of a gap between parents’ environmental awareness and their actual purchasing behaviour.
Design/Methodology: The research was conducted using a qualitative approach based on semi-structured in-depth interviews on a convenient sample of 30 current and prospective first-time parents who are in the transitional life phase and was analyzed by thematic analysis.
Findings: The transition to parenthood leads to change in priorities, increased perceived risk, and more intensive information seeking before purchasing. Product safety and quality are dominant purchase motives and are perceived as the primary aspect of social responsibility towards consumers, while environmental responsibility plays a secondary but significant role. Parents rely heavily on recommendations from close friends and experts, while negative experiences from online sources have a stronger influence on purchasing behaviour decisions than positive recommendations.
Practical Implications: The results suggest that manufacturers and retailers of baby and children's products should prioritize communicating product safety and quality as the foundation of social responsibility, with transparent and credible information at the point of sale, which may contribute to stronger consumer trust and improved retail performance.
Originality/Value: The study contributes to the existing literature by integrating CSR and life-transition perspectives, specifically the transition to parenthood, and by identifying how perceived product safety, trust, and financial constraints interact in shaping responsible purchas-ing decisions among first-time parents. By highlighting the specific motives, perceptions, and con-straints associated with purchasing products for babies and children, the study provides actionable in-sights for manufacturers and retailers seeking to strengthen responsible consumption practices and improve retail performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Kristina Petljak, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business, Zagreb, Croatia

    Kristina Petljak, PhD is Associate Professor at the Department of Trade, Faculty of Economics and Business in Zagreb, Croatia. She has a interdisciplinary background with a research focus on green supply chain management, food supply chain management, retail management, organic and fair trade food. 

References

AbiGhannam, N., & Atkinson, L. (2016). Good green mothers consuming their way through pregnancy: Roles of environmental identities and information seeking in coping with the transition. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(5), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1121142

Adkins, S. (1999). Cause related marketing: Who cares wins. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-4481-5.50023-2

Afflerback, S., Anthony, A. K., Carter, S. K., & Grauerholz, L. (2014). Consumption rituals in the transition to motherhood. Gender Issues, 31(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-014-9115-0

Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K., & Nnodim, P. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.947583

Andreasen, A. R. (1984). Life status changes and changes in consumer preferences and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 784–794. https://doi.org/10.1086/209014

Anselmsson, J., & Johansson, U. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the positioning of grocery brands: An exploratory study of retailer and manufacturer brands at point of purchase. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(10), 835–856. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550710820702

Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626

Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001

Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/209191

Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). AltaMira Press.

Buckingham, D., & Kehily, M. J. (2014). Introduction: Rethinking youth cultures in the age of global media. In D. Buckingham, S. Bragg, & M. J. Kehily (Eds.), Youth cultures in the age of global media. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008152_1

Burningham, K., & Venn, S. (2025). Caring consumption and sustainability: Insights from household provisioning in the first ten years of motherhood. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 54, Article 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100932

Burningham, K., Venn, S., Christie, I., Jackson, T., & Gatersleben, B. (2014). New motherhood: A moment of change in everyday shopping practices? Young Consumers, 15(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-11-2013-00411

Cairns, K., Johnston, J., & MacKendrick, N. (2013). Feeding the "organic child": Mothering through ethical consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 13(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513480162

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132

Dawson, J. (2004). Food retailing, wholesaling and catering. In Food supply chain management (pp. 117–135). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470995556.ch8

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.01.001

Elg, U., & Hultman, J. (2016). CSR: Retailer activities vs consumer buying decisions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(6), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2015-0155

Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. In Environmental management: Readings and cases (Vol. 2, pp. 49–66).

Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. SAGE Publications.

Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2008). The influence of a retailer’s corporate social responsibility program on re-conceptualizing store image. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(6), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.02.003

Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300303

Hansmann, R., Baur, I., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Increasing organic food consumption: An integrating model of drivers and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, Article 123058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123058

Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through green-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002

Heath, T., O’Malley, L., Heath, M., & Story, V. (2016). Caring and conflicted: Mothers’ ethical judgments about consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2441-z

Hemetsberger, A., Bauer, M., Wallpach, S., & Broger, K. (2013). On transit: Changes of role identity and consumer-brand relationships during transition from student to professional life. ZFP – Journal of Research and Management, 35(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369_2013_1_40

Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9

Hogg, M., Folkman Curasi, C., & Maclaran, P. (2004). The (re-)configuration of production and consumption in empty nest households/families. Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1025386042000271351

John, D. R. (1999). Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/209559

Jones, P., & Comfort, D. (2019). Storytelling and corporate social responsibility reporting: A case study commentary on UK food retailers. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(4), Article e1834. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1834

Kell, G., & Ruggie, J. (2001). Global markets and social legitimacy: The case of the Global Compact. In D. Drache (Ed.), The market or the public domain? Global governance and the asymmetry of power (pp. 321–334). Routledge.

Knott, E., Rao, A. H., Summers, K., & Teeger, C. (2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2, Article 73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6

Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, "corporate social marketing" leads the pack. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11(3–4), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245000500414480

LeBeaux, V. S., Epperson, J. E., & Huang, C. L. (2009). Demand for organic and conventional baby food. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 40(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.162126

Loudon, K., Buchanan, S., & Ruthven, I. (2016). The everyday life information seeking behaviours of first-time mothers. Journal of Documentation, 72(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2014-0080

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303258971

Martens, L., Southerton, D., & Scott, S. (2004). Bringing children (and parents) into the sociology of consumption: Towards a theoretical and empirical agenda. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540504043680

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987

Migheli, M. (2021). Green purchasing: The effect of parenthood and gender. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(7), 10576–10600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01073-6

Mitchell, V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910249229

Moon, J. (2001). Business social responsibility: A source of social capital? Reason in Practice, 1(3), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom2001135

Moore, E. S., Wilkie, W. L., & Lutz, R. J. (2002). Passing the torch: Intergenerational influences as a source of brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.2.17.18480

Moschis, G. P. (2007). Life course perspectives on consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0027-3

Nelson, S. K., Kushlev, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The pains and pleasures of parenting: When, why, and how is parenthood associated with more or less well-being? Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 846–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035444

Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). Why don’t consumers care about CSR? A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0925-7

Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Murphy, P. E., & Gruber, V. (2014). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1787-y

Paiker, M., Lienbacher, E., & Vallaster, C. (2024). New parents, new shopping habits? CSR knowledge, CSR cues, and baby product advertisements. In S. Markovic, A. Lindgreen, N. Koporcic, & M. Micevsk (Eds.), Approaches to corporate social responsibility (pp. 48–66). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003255833-4

Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

Ray, S. J. (2011). How many mothers does it take to change all the light bulbs? The myth of green motherhood. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative, 2(1), 81–101.

Rollinson, D. (2002). Organisational behaviour: An integrated approach. Pearson Education.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Schäfer, M., Herde, A., & Kropp, C. (2010). Life events as turning points for sustainable nutrition. In System innovation for sustainability (Vol. 4, pp. 210–226). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351279369-12

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838

Sevin, E., & Ladwein, R. (2008). To start being: The anticipation of a social role through consumption in life transition: The case of the first-time pregnancy. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 325–332.

Sevón, E. (2007). Narrating ambivalence of maternal responsibility. Sociological Research Online, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1527

Small, M. L. (2009). How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586

Soucie, S., Štulec, I., & Petljak, K. (2024). Društveno odgovorno poslovanje maloprodavača proizvoda za bebe i djecu u Republici Hrvatskoj. Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Ekonomski fakultet. https://csrinretail.net.efzg.hr/

Thompson, G., & Glaser, L. (2001, July 8–11). National demand for organic and conventional baby foods [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, Logan, UT, United States.

Thompson, S., Michaelson, J., Abdallah, S., Johnson, V., Morris, D., Riley, K., & Simms, A. (2011). "Moments of change" as opportunities for influencing behavior. New Economics Foundation.

Uzzell, D., & Leach, R. (2003). The implementation and evaluation of cotton nappy provision at East Surrey Hospital Maternity Unit. University of Surrey.

Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X49122

VOICE Group. (2010). Buying into motherhood? Problematic consumption and ambivalence in transitional phases. Consumption Markets & Culture, 13(4), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2010.502414

White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649

Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/258977

Published

15.06.2026