From Bubble to Habitable Sphere
The Potential of Sphere in Individual Housing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31522/p.33.2(70).9Keywords:
bubble house, habitable sphere, individual housing, new domesticityAbstract
The objective of this research is to examine the potential of the sphere in the context of architecture for individual housing. The point of departure is the idea of the bubble and the identification of the connotations inherent to it since antiquity that have inspired architects to employ spheres that challenge settled architectural paradigms. The development and use of the sphere are presented through a selection of the most important examples - from the first known utopian vision designed by Antoine Laurent Thomas Vaudoyer in 1783 to the constructed and actually used facilities designed for individual dwellings in the 20th century.
The interior design strategies that can address the challenges posed by curved envelope and optimize the use of space in spherical individual dwellings have been further explored in a practical assignment given to students enrolled in the Interior Workshop in the Graduate Programme of Architecture and Urban Planning at the Faculty of Architecture in Zagreb in the academic year 2020/2021. In addition to these architectural problems of formal nature, the intention of this design-driven experiment was to examine the affinity of the younger generation towards moving away from traditional models of layouts for individual housing, with the goal of possibly creating more humanized spaces that support the idea of a new domesticity: nomadic lifestyles, the integration of work into the domestic sphere, new family models (e.g., single-occupant) or the increasing need for privacy. In the architecture of individual housing, the sphere is in general an uncommon phenomenon. And yet there is a perceptible continuity of innovative architectural forays into the search for the most effective application of this elementary geometrical form.
References
1. Almgren, F. J. and Taylor, J. E. (1976) 'The Geometry of Soap Films and Soap Bubbles', Scientific American, 235(1) [online]. pp 82-93. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24950395 [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
2. Arnheim, R. (1977) ‘Symbols in Architecture’, Salmagundi, (36) [online]. pp 69-75. Available at: https://thearchitecturalmythologems.com/symbolism-in-architecture/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
3. Bachelard, G. (2011) Air and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Movement. Dallas: Dallas Institute Publications.
4. Banham, R. (1965) A Home is Not a House, Art in America, 53(2) [online]. pp 70-79. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/670295168/Banham-R-1965-a-Home-is-Not-a-House [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
5. Bonomo, M. (2023) ‘Patronage as Collaboration. Dante Bini’s Villas in Sardinia', Dimensions. Journal of Architectural Knowledge, 3(5) [online]. pp 179-204. https://doi.org/10.14361/dak-2023-0511. [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
6. Bossi, L. (2007) ‘Spherical Utopia’, Domus [online]. Available at: https://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/2007/06/19/spherical-utopia.html [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
7. Bradbury, D. (2020) ‘Eduardo Longo: Casa Bola’ in Bradbury, D. The Iconic Interior: 1900 to the Present. New York: Thames & Hudson. pp 190 – 193.
8. Cheney, L. (2020) ‘Homo bulla est: Bubbles in Northern Europe Self – Portraits’, Venti, 1(2) [online]. Available at: https://www.venti-journal.com/liana-cheney-1 [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
9. Collins, G. R. (1968) ‘The Visionary Tradition in Architecture', The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, 26(8) [online]. pp 310-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/3258445 [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
10. Cureton, P. and Dunn, N. (2014) Future of cities: a visual history of the future. [online] London: Government Office for Science. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321625853_Future_of_cities_a_visual_history_of_the_future [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
11. de Graaf, A. (2024) ‘Wonen in een bollenveld’, Silva, 5(1), pp 26-41 [online]. Available at: https://www.bossche-encyclopedie.nl/publicaties/silva/2024-1.pdf [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
12. Emmer, M. (1987) 'Soap Bubbles in Art and Science: From the Past to the Future of Math Art', Leonardo, 20(4) [online]. pp 327-334. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578527. [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
13. Fracalossi, I. (2014) ArchDaily Brasil. Clássicos da Arquitetura: Casa Bola / Eduardo Longo [online]. Available at: https://www.archdaily.com.br/br/01-173627/classicos-da-arquitetura-casa-bola-slash-eduardo-longo [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
14. Fuller, R. B. (1973 [1938]) Nine Chains to the Moon. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.
15. Fuller, R. B. (1953) 'The Cardboard House', Perspecta, 2 [online]. https://doi.org/10.2307/1566822. [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
16. Head, J. (2011) No Nails, No Lumber: The Bubble Houses of Wallace Neff, Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
17. Hollein, H. (1968) ‘Alles ist Architektur’, Bau: Schrift für Architektur und Städtebau, 23(1-2), pp 2.
18. Kuma, K. (2007) Kengo Kuma and associates. Teehaus [online]. Available at: https://kkaa.co.jp/en/project/teehaus/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
19. La Pietra, U. (1967-1969) Ugo La Pietra. Le immersioni [online]. Available at: https://www.ugolapietra.com/anni-60/le-immersioni/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
20. Lillo Giner, S. and Molina-Siles, P. (2024) 'The imagined city. Futurism, utopia and Archigram', EGE Revista de Expresión Gráfica en la Edificación, (21), Valencia: Universitat Politécnica de València [online]. pp 103-118. https://doi.org/10.4995/ege.2024.22168. [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
21. McLean, W. (2018) Frederick Lanchester and the invention of the air-supported roof in Wouters, I. Voorde, S. Bertels, I. et al. (eds.) Building Knowledge, Constructing Histories. Brussels: CRC Press, pp 921-926. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429506208 [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
22. McLean, W. (2013) ‘Skill: Inflatable Concrete Domes’, The Architectural Review (1391) [online]. Available at: https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/craft/skill-inflatable-concrete-domes [Accessed: 07 May 2025].
23. Mollard, M. (2020) ‘Living in a bubble: smooth surfaces to shield’, The Architectural Review (1472) [online]. Available at: https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/living-in-a-bubble-smooth-surfaces-to-shield [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
24. Moonan, W. (2023) Smithsonian magazine. The Architectural Genius of the Geodesic Dome and the Challenge of Putting It All Back Together [online]. Available at: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/the-architectural-genius-of-the-geodesic-dome-and-the-challenge-of-putting-it-all-back-together-180982492/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
25. Mori, Y. (1996) ‘The Iconography of homo bulla in Northern Art from the Sixteenth to the Nineteenth Centuries' in Bauer, G. G. (ed.) Homo Ludens VI: Ball- und Kugelspiele. München – Salzburg: Verlag Emil Katzbichler, pp 149-176.
26. Newman, O. (1969) 'Plan for an underground nuclear shelter', Esquire_ December, pp 186-187 [online]. Available at: https://classic.esquire.com/issue/19691201/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
27. Prix, W. D. ([1968] 2009) Coop Himmeb(l)au. Organism for Living [online]. Available at: https://coop-himmelblau.at/projects/the-cloud-1968/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
28. Serebryakova, K. (2016) Von der Natur gefangen: Frei Otto, Architekt [online]. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20160303193719/http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/impulse/imp/alles.php?id=6 [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
29. Sky, A. and Stone, M. (1976) Unbuilt America: Forgotten Architecture in the United States from Thomas Jefferson to the Space Age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Sloterdijk, P. (2011) Bubbles: Spheres Volume I: Microspherology, Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
31. Steadman, P. (2006) 'Why are most buildings rectangular?', Architectural Research Quarterly, 10(2) [online]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135506000200 [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
32. Varro, M. T. (1912) Rerum rusticarum, libri tres. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner Verlag [online]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/rerumrusticaruml00varruoft [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
33. Williams, K. (1999) 'The Well-Rounded Architect: Spheres and Circles in Architectural Design'. In: Bridges 99: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science. [online] Winfield: Southwestern College, pp 173-184. Available at: https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/1999/bridges1999-173.pdf [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
34. Zexin, S. and Mei H. (2017) 'Robotic Form-Finding and Construction Based on the Architectural Projection Logic', the 2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering and Materials Science IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 216, Issue 1, pp 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/216/1/012058. [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
35. *** (2019) Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation. Frank Lloyd Wright’s Inflatable Architecture Experiment [online]. Available at: https://franklloydwright.org/frank-lloyd-wrights-inflatable-architecture-experiment/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
36. *** (2025) Los Angeles Conservancy: Air Form “Bubble House” [online]. Available at: https://www.laconservancy.org/learn/historic-places/airform-bubble-house/ [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
37. *** (2022) The Plan [online]. Available at: https://www.theplan.it/eng/whats_on/dante-bini-the-pioneer-of-automated-building-construction [Accessed: 07 April 2025].
38. *** (1961) Portable Globe House for Well-Rounded Living, Science and Mechanics, January, New York: Popular Mechanics Company, pp 57-58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dina Vulin Ileković, Boris Ileković
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 authors and journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In agreeing this form, you certify that:
- You read the ethical codex of the PROSTOR available at journal web.
- You submitted work is your original work, and has not previously been published and does not include any form of plagiarism.
- You own copyright in the submitted work, and are therefore permitted to assign the licence to publish to PROSTOR.
- Your submitted work contains no violation of any existing copyright or other third party right or any material of an obscene, libellous or otherwise unlawful nature.
- You have obtained permission for and acknowledged the source of any illustrations, diagrams or other material included in the work of which you are not the copyright owner.
- You have taken due care to ensure the accuracy of the work, and that, to the best of your knowledge, there are no false statements made within it.
- All co-authors of this submitted work are aware of, and in agreement with, the terms of this licence and that the submitted manuscript has been approved by these authors.
