Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
All submissions must meet the following requirements.
- The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
- Where available, DOIs and/or URLs for the references have been provided.
- The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
- The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
Articles
The Editorial Board accepts unpublished articles in English language and possibly in Croatian language. The paper, including the references and supplements, should not exceed 75 000 characters. Abstract not longer than 300 characters, and a short list of key words must be included (5-10 key words).
- The Review Process Policy (for Articles)
After submission, manuscripts will go through the following stages:
- Formal examination to ensure the identity of the author is not on the manuscript and to check length, as well as situations where the submission is self-evidently unsuitable. This stage is normally complete within two weeks of submission.
- A substantive assessment by one of the Editors-In-Chief to assess whether the manuscript is prima facie suitable and ready to be sent for anonymous review. If the manuscript is not thought suitable or ready it will be rejected at this point. This normally occurs within two weeks, so at the latest one month after submission.
- If the manuscript is suitable and ready for review, normally two anonymous reviewers will then be sought to offer independent and expert advice. This stage can take up to a month as it can be difficult to locate suitable reviewers who are willing to act.
- If the manuscript is sent for review, the reviewers are given a standard period of four weeks (though this may be extended if the reviewer needs more time).
- Once the external reviews have been received, the Editors-In-Chief will make an assessment based on those reviews and their own assessment of the paper. A decision will be made whether to reject, to accept or to seek revisions.
- If revisions are sought, the author will be asked to resubmit the revised paper explaining how they have responded to the criticisms of the Reviewers/Editors. The revised version, once submitted will probably again be sent out for review (often to the initial reviewers, if available). In order to maintain anonymity, responses to reviewer comments should not contain identifiable information.
- If accepted, the author will once again be asked to check all references to ensure they are correct and to ensure the manuscript complies with the style-guide.
- Online Posting by the Author (Repositories, SSRN)
Authors are permitted to publish a pre-publication text of their article on repositories such as SSRN. But they should replace the pre-publication text with a reference to the Journal website once the article appears in FirstView. On acceptance for publication, the author is permitted to post the accepted manuscript in an institutional repository. But such a publication should still contain a reference to the year and page reference of the publication in the SLPD Journal.
Books reviews
The Journal accepts reviews of books, not older than three years. The desirable length of review is between 5000 and 9000 characters. All the relevant information on the reviewed book must be indicated at the beginning of the text, and the author's name should be stated at the end. Footnotes are not permitted.
Authors are required to submit all book reviews to the SLPD Journal in Word format to: slpd@pravri.uniri.hr
Copyright Notice
The Editorial Board accepts for consideration exclusively previously unpublished papers. Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the journal, but grant the right of the publication, both in printed and in electronic form, to the journal.
The paper accepted for publication or already published in the Journal may be published by the author(s) in other publications with proper notice of its publication in the Journal.
Papers published in the journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC licence 4.0.) until vol. 3, no. 1 (2025) and from vol. 3, no. 2 (2025) under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY licence 4.0), which means that users may read, download, copy, redistribute, print, search, and link to the material, modify, transform, or build upon it, or use it for any other lawful purpose, as long as they acknowledge the source appropriately.
The use of psychological measurement instruments and computer programs should be in accordance with applicable regulations, and the authors should submit a statement on the use of legitimate copies or possession of written permission for the rights to their use.
Authorship and AI
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, their use is expanding fast even in research publications. SLPD Journal joins Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and other authorities in stating that AI tools cannot be listed as an author of a paper. AI tools cannot meet the requirements for authorship as they cannot take responsibility for the content of the submitted work, cannot affirm the presence or absence of conflict of interest nor manage copyright and license agreements.
Use of AI tools
The SLPD Journal will not accept manuscripts that use AI tools (chatbots) as sources as the content generated by LLMs is not traceable or reproducible.
Acceptable uses of AI tools include proofreading, style check, translation, image improvement to increase quality.
Authors who use AI tools in the process of their research, such as for collection and/or analysis of data or for production of images and graphics, or software codes must transparently disclose in the initial part of the paper which AI tool and how it was used. The use of linguistic tools must be disclosed in the Acknowledgement section. Authors bear full responsibility for the content of their manuscript, including the parts produced by an AI tool, and are thus liable for any breach of publication ethics.
Reviewers and AI
Reviewers are responsible for keeping the confidentiality of data through the process of evaluation until the final decision is made. This must be kept in mind if using any LLM tools. Large parts of manuscript containing confidential information must not be copied into LLM-based tools. Reviewers are allowed to use only the tools that can assist in formatting language and style, they must not use AI tools to generate review reports.
The SLPD Journal's supports and follows the Elsevier Generative AI policies for journals.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.