REGULATING SPORT AFTER SUPERLEAGUE: COMPETITION, GOVERNANCE, AND THE SOCIETAL DIMENSION OF MEDIA RIGHTS IN THE EU AND THE ITALIAN FRAMEWORK

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30925/slpdj.3.2.3

Keywords:

Superleague, TV rights, Solidarity, Collective Selling

Abstract

The Superleague judgment marked a pivotal moment in the evolution of EU sports regulation, prompting a renewed examination of how competition law interacts with the governance and societal functions of sport. This article explores the implications of the judgment for the regulatory framework governing sport in Europe and Italy, with particular attention to the treatment of media rights as a vehicle for financing sport’s broader social mission. While media rights represent a crucial source of revenue, their allocation and exploitation cannot be understood solely through the lens of market power or commercial efficiency. Instead, they sit at the intersection of competition law, sporting autonomy, and the principles of solidarity and competitive balance that underpin the European sports model. By integrating EU-level jurisprudence with national regulations, the article argues that the case law provides an opportunity to strengthen a coherent regulatory approach that balances commercialisation with public-interest objectives.

References

1. Asser Instituut / IViR, T.M.C. Study on Sports Organisers’ Rights in the European Union. February 2014. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/sport/news/2014/docs/study-sor2014-final-report-gc-compatible_en.pdf.

2. Bongarzone, Amelia. “Sport, immagine ed informazione nello sfruttamento dei diritti televisivi.” Rassegna di diritto ed economia dello sport 1, no. 3(2006): 375-414.

3. Clarich, Marcello. “La sentenza Bosman: verso il tramonto degli ordinamenti giuridici sportivi?” Rivista di diritto sportivo 47, no. 3-4 (1996): 393-408.

4. Coccia, Massimo. “Coordinamento e competizione nello sport.” In Sport e mercato, edited by Flamini Antonio and Di Nella Luca, 35-39. Napoli: ESI, 2006.

5. Colucci, Michele and Vaccaro; Maria José, eds. Vincolo sportivo e indennità di formazione. Roma: SPLC, 2010.

6. Deloitte. Deloitte Football Money League, 2025. https://www.deloitte.com/uk/en/services/consulting-financial/analysis/deloitte-football-money-league.html.

7. Di Majo, Alessandro. I diritti audiovisivi nello sport. Torino: Giappichelli, 2019.

8. Di Nella, Luca. “I diritti audiovisivi su eventi sportivi.” Rassegna di diritto ed economia dello sport 4, no. 1 (2009): 36-70.

9. Di Nella, Luca. “Costituzionalità della giustizia sportiva.” Rassegna di diritto ed economia dello sport 7, no.1 (2012): 45-91.

10. Di Nella, Luca. “Lo sport nel diritto primario dell’Unione europea.” giustiziasportiva.it (2010).

11. Fischer, Paul and Wörner, Jan. “EU-Kartellrecht und Ein-Platz-Prinzip nach der Super League Entscheidung – Coubertins Erbe in Gefahr?”. Sport und Recht 31, no.5(2024): 372-380.

12. Geey, Daniel. “Collectivity v Exclusivity: Conflict in the Broadcasting Arena.” Entertainment Law Review 15, no. 1 (2004): 7–11.

13. Indraccolo, Emanuele. Rapporti e tutele nel dilettantismo sportivo. Napoli: ESI, 2008.

14. Indraccolo, Emanuele. “Prime riflessioni sul d.lg. 9 gennaio 2008, n. 9: il bene «evento sportivo».” Rassegna di diritto ed economia dello sport 3, no.3 (2008): 419-473.

15. Indraccolo, Emanuele. “Le certificazioni sanitarie di idoneità.” Rivista di diritto sportivo 66, no. 2 (2015): 298-313.

16. Indraccolo, Emanuele. “Sport femminile e discriminazioni di genere.” Associazione Italiana Giuristi 12, (2020): 594-619.

17. Kienapfel, Philip and Stein, Andreas. “The Application of Articles 81 and 82 EC in the Sport Sector.” Competition Policy Newsletter 3, (2007): 6–14.

18. Landi, Roberta. Autonomia e controllo nelle associazioni sportive. Napoli: ESI, 2016.

19. Landi, Roberta. “Corte di giustizia europea e giudizio sportivo. Il caso Superlega.” Rassegna di diritto ed economia dello sport 20, no. 2 (2024): 400-417.

20. Lepore, Andrea. “Principio di specificità e principio di sussidiarietà nello sport.” Rassegna di diritto ed economia dello sport 10, no. 2-3 (2015): 289-324.

21. Lianos, Ioannis. “Competition Law in the European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon.” In The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon, edited by Diamond Ashiagbor, Nicola Countouris, and Ioannis Lianos, 252–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084338.

22. López Frías, Francisco et al. “Whose Interests? Which Solidarity? Challenges of Developing a European Super League.” Soccer & Society 24, no. 4 (2023): 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2023.2194511.

23. Monti, Giorgio. “EU Competition Law after the Grand Chamber’s December 2023 Sports Trilogy.” TILEC Discussion Papers (2024). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4686842.

24. Nivarra, Luca. “I diritti esclusivi di trasmissione di eventi.” In Annali italiani del diritto d'autore 2009, edited by Luigi Carlo Ubertazzi, 33-45. Milano: Giuffre, 2010.

25. Perlingieri, Pietro. “Equilibrio normativo.” Rassegna di diritto civile (2001): 334 ff. Reprinted in Perlingieri, Pietro. Il diritto dei contratti fra persona e mercato. Napoli:ESI, 2003, 441-462.

26. Perlingieri, Pietro. “Nuovi profili del contratto.” Rivista critica del diritto privato 19, no. 2-3(2001): 223-250.

27. Pijetlovic, Katarina. EU Sports Law and Breakaway Leagues in Football. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-048-0.

28. Poddighe, Elena. Diritti televisivi e teoria dei beni. 2nd ed. Padova: CEDAM, 2003.

29. Romano, Geremia. I diritti radiotelevisivi sulle manifestazioni sportive. In Contributi di diritto civile, edited by Valerio Donato, 124. Torino: Giappichelli, 2004.

30. UEFA.com. "United for Succes, UEFA Strategic Vision 2024-2030." Accessed November 28, 2025. https://www.uefa.com/news-media/news/028a-1a200a82f2dd-6e9595139108-1000--uefa-strategy-2024-30-united-for-success-approved/.

31. Van den Bogaert, Stefaan, and Ben Van Rompuy. “The New Testament for Sports and EU Competition Law in European Super League, ISU, and Royal Antwerp.” Common Market Law Review 62, no. 2 (2025): 577–622. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2025029.

32. Van Rompuy, Ben. Economic Efficiency: The Sole Concern of Modern Antitrust Policy? Non-Efficiency Considerations under Article 101 TFEU. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2012.

33. Weatherill, Stephen. “The Sale of Rights to Broadcast Sporting Events under EC Law.” International Sports Law Journal 3–4 (2006): 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-939-9_13.

34. Zeno-Zencovich, Vincenzo. “La statalizzazione dei diritti televisivi sportivi.” Rassegna di diritto ed economia dello sport 4, no. 1 (2009): 126-140.

35. European Union. Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty. Official Journal of the European Union L 1/1 (2003). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2003/1/oj.

36. European Union. Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on Consumer Rights. Official Journal of the European Union L 304. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/83/oj.

37. European Union. Nice Declaration, Annex IV, “Declaration Relating to the Specific Characteristics of Sport and Its Social Functions in Europe.” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/nice2_en.htm

38. European Commission. Case COMP/C.2-37.398 — Joint selling of the commercial rights of the UEFA Champions League. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2003/778/oj.

39. European Commission. Case COMP/38.173, Collective selling of FA Premier League’s broadcasting rights. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/38173/38173_134_9.pdf.

40. European Commission. Case No IV/37.214 - DFB - Central marketing of TV and radio broadcasting rights for certain football competitions in Germany. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/37214/37214_90_1.pdf.

41. Italy. Article 118 of the Italian Constitution.

42. Italy. Article 2 of Legislative Decree No. 242/1999 (Melandri Decree).

43. Italy. Legislative Decree 9/2008 and subsequent amendment, in implementation of Enabling Law 106/2007.

44. Italy. Legislative Decree No. 242 of 23 July 1999 (so-called Melandri Decree).

45. Bundesgerichtshof (BGH). 2 December 1974, II ZR 78/72. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (1975): 771 ff.

46. Bundesgerichtshof (BGH). 23 November 1998, II ZR 54/98. Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofes in Zivilsachen 140: 74 ff.

47. Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08. Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd [2011] ECR I-09083.

48. Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08. FAPL and Others; Murphy [2011] ECR I-9083.

49. Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Case C-333/21. European Superleague Company [2023] ECLI:EU:C:2023:1011.

50. Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). C 415/93. Bosman [1995] EU:C:1995:463.

51. TAR Lazio. Decision of 17 February 2025, No. 3409.

52. AGCM, Decision No. 31263 of June 18, 2024, A562. https://agcm.it/.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

REGULATING SPORT AFTER SUPERLEAGUE: COMPETITION, GOVERNANCE, AND THE SOCIETAL DIMENSION OF MEDIA RIGHTS IN THE EU AND THE ITALIAN FRAMEWORK. (2025). Sports Law, Policy & Diplomacy Journal, 3(2), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.30925/slpdj.3.2.3