THE (IN)ADEQUACY OF THE REGULATION OF EXTENDING PRE-TRIAL DETENTION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/34059Keywords:
pre-trial detention, ordering and extending detention, Supreme Court, constitutional amendment, right to appealAbstract
At the normative and practical level, the article analyses the regulation of Article 20 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, which vests in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia the power to extend pre-trial detention during the criminal investigation phase for a maximum of three months. From the perspective of comparative law, this is a Slovenian peculiarity. The author argues that the current regulation is systemically inadequate, and fails to guarantee the highest level of human rights protection for the detained individual. The following objections support this thesis: the Supreme Court’s power to extend pre-trial detention is inconsistent with the fundamental role of this court; the arrangement prevents the defendant from filing a comprehensive legal appeal; it does not enhance the perception of impartiality in trials or trust in the judiciary; and it is unnecessary for developing case law in the area of deprivation of liberty. The article proposes alternative solutions that would better align with the Supreme Court’s role and adhere more closely to the original intent of ensuring the highest level of human rights protection in pre-trial detention decisions.
References
Baker E, ‘The crisis that changed everything: Reflections of and reflections on COVID-19’ (2020) 4 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 311
Bejatović S, ‘Mere obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku (pojam, ratio legis predviđanja, vrste, opšta pravila primene i iskustva u primeni država regiona’ in Pritvor i druge mere obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku: međunarodni pravni standardi, regionalna zakonodavstva i primena (Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji, 2019) 9
Betetto N, ‘Kako preprečiti, da Vrhovno sodišče postane vir neenotne sodne prakse’ (2015) 41(6-7) Podjetje in delo 970
Bobek M, ‘Quantity or Quality Reassessing the Role of Supreme Jurisdictions in Central Europe’, (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 33
Dolenc M, ‘Vrhovno sodišče kot prvostopenjsko sodišče’ (2011) 30(19) Pravna praksa 6
Durđević Z, ‘Dekonstitucionalizacija Vrhovnog suda RH u kaznenim predmetima i jačanje autoritarnih mehanizama za ujednačavanje sudske prakse: propuštena prilika Ustavnog suda RH’ (2020), 27 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 417
Fišer Z, Zakon o kazenskem postopku s komentarjem (Lexpera, 2023)
Galič A, Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije (Nova univerza, Evropska pravna fakulteta, 2019)
Galič A, A Civil Law Perspective on the Supreme Court and its Functions (Warsaw University Press, 2019)
Garačić A and Novosel D, Zakon o kaznenom postupku u sudskoj praksi, Knjiga prva (Glava I. - Glava XIX) (Libertin naklada, 2018)
Grad F, Kaučič I and Zagorc S, Ustavno pravo (Pravna fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani, 2018)
Matthias J, Zivilprozessordnung-Kommentar, 22. Aufl (Mohr Siebeck, 2013)
Jerovšek T, Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije (Fakulteta za podiplomske državne in evropske študije, 2002)
Josipović I, ‘Istražni zatvor vs. pritvor: reforma ili restauracija’ (2008) 15(2) Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 915
Kambovski V and Vitlarov T ‘Mera pritvora u makedonskom krivičnom postupku’ in Pritvor i druge mere obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku: međunarodni pravni standardi, regionalna zakonodavstva i primena (Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji, 2019) 139
Kerševan E, Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije (Nova univerza, Evropska pravna fakulteta, 2019)
Mažgon, J, Kožuh, B and Medveš, Z Razvoj akcijskega raziskovanja na temeljnih podatkih kvalitativne metodologije (Ljubljana: Scientific Research Institute of the Faculty of Arts, 2008)
Pavčnik M, Argumentacija v pravu (Ljubljana: GV Založba, 2013)
Pavlović Š, Zakon o kaznenom postupku, 2. izdanje (Libertin naklada, 2014)
Pavišić B et al. Kazneno postupkovno pravo, 4. izdanje (Dušević & Kršovnik, 2011)
Pavišić B, Komentar Zakona o kaznenom postupku, Drugo izdajanje (Dušević & Kršovnik, 2013)
Radulović D, ‘Pritvor i druge mjere za obezbeđenje prisustva okrivljenog i nesmetano vođenje krivičnog postupka u krivičnoprocesnom zakonodavstvu Crne Gore (norma i praksa)’ in Pritvor i druge mere obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku: međunarodni pravni standardi, regionalna zakonodavstva i primena (Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji, 2019) 161
Simović MN, ‘Krivično procesno zakonodavstvo BIH i mjere obezbjeđenja prisustva osumnjičenog, odnosno obtuženog u krivičnom postupku (norma i praksa)’ in Pritvor i druge mere obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku: međunarodni pravni standardi, regionalna zakonodavstva i primena (Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji, 2019) 109
Stürner HR and Murray LP, German Civil Justice (Carolina Academic Press, 2004)
Škulič M, ‘Pritvor kao mera obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku (krivičnoprocesno zakonodajstvo Srbije – norma i praksa’ in Pritvor i druge mere obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku: međunarodni pravni standardi, regionalna zakonodavstva i primena (Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji, 2019) 39
Uzelac A, ‘Survival of the Third Legal tradition?’ (2010) 49 Supreme Court Law Review 377
Vavken L, ‘Aktualne procesnopravne dileme odreditve in podaljšanja pripora’ (2022) 41(48) Pravna praksa II
Vavken L, Položaj sodstva v sistemu delitve oblasti (Doctoral thesis, University of Ljubljana, 2022)
Vavken L, ‘Odločanje o priporu v novejših odločbah Ustavnega in Vrhovnega sodišča RS: med zaščito svobode posameznika in učinkovitostjo kazenskega postopka oziroma varnostjo družbe pred kriminalom’ (2025) 27 Odvetnik 15
Zobec J, ‘Od individualnega do javnega (precedenčnega) namena Vrhovnega sodišča: ustavnopravni vidik’ (2015) 41(6-7) Podjetje in delo 919
Zupančič BM, Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije (Fakulteta za podiplomske državne in evropske študije, 2002)
REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS
The Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, Official Gazette, No. 33/91-I, 42/97 – UZS68, 66/00 – UZ80, 24/03 – UZ3a, 47, 68, 69/04 – UZ14, 69/04 – UZ43, 69/04 – UZ50, 68/06 – UZ121,140,143, 47/13 – UZ148, 47/13 – UZ90,97,99, 75/16 – UZ70a in 92/21 – UZ62a (SLO)
The Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, Official Gazette, No. 56/1990, 135/1997, 113/2000, 28/2001, 76/2010, 5/2014 (HR)
The Criminal Procedure Act, Official Gazette, No. 176/21, 96/22 – odl. US, 2/23 – odl. US, 89/23 – odl. US in 53/24 (SLO)
The Criminal Code, Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 50/12, 54/15, 6/16, 38/16, 27/17, 23/20, 91/20, 95/21, 186/21, 105/22 – ZZNŠPP, 16/23 in 107/24 – odl. US. (SLO)
The Criminal Procedure Act, Official Gazette, No. 152/2008, 76/2009, 80/2011, 91/2012, 143/2012, 56/2013, 145/2013, 152/2014, 70/2017, 126/2019, 126/2019, 130/2020, 80/2022, 36/2024 (HR)
The Courts Act, Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 94/07 ,45/08, 96/09, 86/10 – ZJNepS, 33/11, 75/12, 63/13, 17/15, 23/17, 22/18, 16/19 – ZNP-1, 104/20, 203/20 – ZIUPOPDVE, 18/23 – ZDU-1O in 42/24. (SLO)
JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS
The European court of Human Rights, Poppe v. the Netherlands, No. 3227/04 (24 March 2009)
The European court of Human Rights, Micallef v. Malta, No. 17056/06 (15 October 2009)
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, U-I-25/95 (27 November 1997) (SLO)
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Up 965/11 (9 May 2013) (SLO)
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, U-I-12/2015 (28 September 2016) (SLO)
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Up-879/14 (20 April 2015) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, I Ips 463/2006 (25 January 2007) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, I Ips 346/2009 (18 March 2010) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, Ips 1278/2012 (24 October 2013) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, I Ips 23071/2014, ( 7 February 2018) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, I Ips 18120/2015 (15 March 2018) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, XI Ips 10906/2018 (30 March 2018) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 50240/2018 (22 January 2019) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 52340/2018 (6 February 2019 (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 55320/2018 ( 20 February 2019) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 53972/2020 (23 December 2020) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 53718/2020 (24 December 2020) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 61646/2020 (15 February 2021) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, XI Ips 19156/2021 ( 9 September 2021) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, XI Ips 25329/2021 (30 September 2021) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 174/2022 (28 March 2022) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 9458/2022 (15 September 2022) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 23821/2022 (10 October 2022) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 69280/2022 ( 23 January 2023) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 14214/2023 (31 May 2023) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 32662/2023 (7 August 2023) (SLO)
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, II Kr 49986/2023 (11 October 2023) (SLO)
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, U-I-4658/2019 i U-I-4659/2019 (3 November 2020) (HR)
INTERNET SOURCES
Heard C and Fair H, Pre-Trial Detention and Its Overuse: Evidence from Ten Countries (2019) Birkbeck University of London, <https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/pre-trial_detention_final.pdf> accessed 20 February 2025
Letno poročilo o poslovanju sodišča za leto 2022 in Letno poročilo o poslovanju sodišča za leto 2023, <https://www.sodisce.si/vsrs/osnovne_informacije_o_sodiscu/pomembni_dokumenti/> accessed 20 February 2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luka Vavken
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in Pravni vjesnik of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in Pravni vjesnik.
