Reviewers form

The Cartography and Geoinformation journal

Croatian Cartographic Society

Međimurska 17

10000 Zagreb, Croatia

 

REVIEW

1. Title:

2. Does the paper’s content thematically belong to the area of the Cartography and Geoinformation journal: YES – NO

3. Can the paper be published in the Cartography and Geoinformation journal: YES – NO – CONDITIONALLY

4. In case of publishing, the paper has to be categorized in one of the following groups (circle the appropriate answer):

a) Original scientific paper contains unpublished results of the original scientific research, and the scientific information is presented in such a way that it permits the exactness of analysis and derivations the results are based upon to be checked.

 b) Preliminary communication is a scientific work containing one or more new scientific data, the nature of which requests urgent publishing. It need not convey sufficient number of details for repetition or checking of results.

c) Review is a scientific paper containing original, condensed and critical presentation of a field or its segment in which the author participates actively. The role of the author’s original contribution in this field must be pointed out as related to already published works, accompanied by the survey of these works.

d) Professional paper contains useful contributions from the professional field that are not bound to the original research of the author, and the observations presented need not be a novelty in the profession.

5. Does the title match the content of the paper: YES – NO

6. Is the abstract all right: YES – NO

7. Are references quoted according to the instructions given to the authors: YES – NO

8. Can images and tables be understood without reading their context: YES – NO

9. Does the paper contain material that is neither new nor interesting and could therefore be reduced? Conversely, does it require additional material? (If you need more space, please use another sheet of paper.)

10. Write your final opinion and recommendation in a few sentences.

Reviewer's signature: